The method test_if_product, used in the workflow to test that the mrp production is for a product (!= service), used to call the method _action_compute_lines in order to compute the production lines and determine from them the production type.
The thing is, the method _action_compute_lines, despite the fact it returns the lines of the production, actually creates the lines. So, just to test if the production was of product type, the productin lines were created, in database.
This rev. introduces a _prepare_lines method, which returns the computed production lines, without actually creating them in database, so the test_if_product method can test if the production is of product type without creating the production lines.
Therefore, production lines are now computed and created during the action_compute method, instead of computing them when the production was tested to get the production type.
Computing the lines before the action_compute has as side effect to not set the scheduled date of the work orders in module mrp_operations, at MO confirmation (as, on confirmation, the action_compute method is called only for productions for which the lines are not yet computed, and mrp_operations overide action_compute to set the scheduled date)
opw-620189
Pass group_id information when a manufacturing order is created from
a procurement to keep a better traceability and know the reason of stock.move
creation.
Fixes#4019
if the bom is phantom and has no line, we attempt to find a new bom with the default product uom
This is possible that we find the same bom that the current one
In such a case, we must not explode, to avoid recursion.
This rev. 7307227 ensured to not (re-)set the state 'confirmed' to exploded moves with a more advanced state (for instance, 'assigned')
Nevertheless, the location chaining is performed on the move confirmation, through the action_confirm method of the stock.move model. Besides, the resulting moves of the _action_explode method had the state 'confirmed' on creation, the 'confirmed' state wasn't set by the method 'action_confirm', meaning that the moves were confirmed without having the location chaining done. Allowing moves to go through the action_confirm method even if the state was 'confirmed' or further triggered the location chaining.
Preventing already confirmed moves to go through the action_confirm method prevented the location chaining, thus.
We now create the resulting moves with the 'draft' state, and then confirm them through the procurement workflow signal 'button_confirm'. Thus, the resulting moves are confirmed by going through the action_confirm method, writing the confirmed state and triggering the location chaining at the same time. We then write the 'assigned' state if necessary.
opw-617235
The field bom_id is required on a manufacturing order and deleting a mrp.bom would block the current mo.
Restrict the suppression for manufacturing order in progress.
Fixes#3417
This reverts commit 61a8971db5.
This rev. is from a 7.0 forward port b4d602fdd3379a0310ec0b9a56f9b88226
This is no longer needed in 8.0, with the new WMS
When validating a SO containing a `make to stock` + `manufacture` product
(with bom + orderpoint), we have the following stock moves:
* Product move
* Manufacturing order
Selling 1 such product would yield 2 as incoming quantity, an
inconsistency that this commit solves by setting the location_id of the
product move to the MO's location_dest_id (in the same fashion that
the create_pickings method does in an mts/buy case)
opw-616229
When consuming product, the main_production_move is set as the source of production (used for consumed_for parameter)
However the method action_consume now (since 661a204) returns the new moves (when spliting) instead of the original one. This means that the tracebility would fail.
[IMP] Recheck should be type object and procure_method read only when not in draft
[FIX] Inversion of moves in the correct way and assigning production_id
As the moves are split the other way, the original move needs to be done. Also the production_id for linking the
new to be produced moves and the production order must be written on those.
[IMP] Clean
A previous refactoring brought a bom_line_ids field on the mrp.bom, thus
deprecating the _child_compute method. But the previous refactoring did
not go through all the views, breaking everything that relied on the
_child_compute (tree view, report). As the bom_line_ids refers to the
mrp.bom.line model (introduced by this previous refactoring, note:
_child_compute returned mrp.bom record) and that we can't make a treeview
showing different model, this patch introduce a function field _get_child_bom_lines
on the mrp.line model, allowing to go through the bom_line_ids of a mrp.bom.line
if this mrp.bom.line refers to a mrp.bom.
[IMP] Rename bom_line_ids to child_line_ids in mrp_bom_line to avoid confusion
Module description of procurement was deprecated (talking about mrp, ...) and in product_extended
it described things not implemented in the module.
In _bom_find, we passed a UoM which was not used in Saas-4 and it would not be logical that you
need to select a BoM that matches the UoM, so I removed it.
In the demo data, there was still a push rule which triggered a move from output to pack. The copy=False
is correct for production_id when you would have these push rules.
For the properties: we want to allow to take a bom which has no properties, but only when there is no other
BoM matching the properties we pass.
Update module descriptions
[IMP] production_id copy + no round
[IMP] _bom_find without uom, property correction
Simplify the action_consume of the consumption lines after the corrections
by Kevin Wang. Also the UoMs are revised as the action_consume uses the default UoM
of the product.
We have to avoid circular boms where a child bom should not contain the product that
represents the parent bom, but it is possible for example to use another product of the parent bom in
the child bom.
As the consume line move has no procurement rule, its origin will have no description. So, when there is
none it will also check the description of the previous move (when passed to procurement for example) This way
the chained moves or purchase order for example will have the MO-number as origin and not nothing.
[IMP] Change assignation
[IMP] UoM changes continuation
[IMP] Make sure we can use 2 times the same product in a BoM
[IMP] Source document for consume lines to procurement
[IMP] Add purchase order origin on picking
[WIP] Picking type on move for location on routing
[IMP] Provide extra function for custom buttons on picking
[IMP] Action assign optim
[IMP] Push apply should take invoice_state into account. Propagation of cancel of stock moves should depend on procurement rule
For instance, setting a BOM Phantom with:
Finished product: stockable, MTO Manufacture
Components: stockable, MTS, Buy. Inventory set to 1000
Stock moves of components are directly set to assigned once the procurement confirmed thanks to JIT
The stock moves should not be set back to confirmed after they have been assigned
When searching for a bom based on a product.product, the method used to return any bom linked to the template (so searching for bom for variant A could return bom for variant B if both share the same product.template).
This will allow to return bom not linked to a variant without returning the one of another variant (opw 609358)
The product_id field is not required on a mrp.bom (while product_tmpl_id is). When searching for BOMs linked to a product.product, we should display the one specific to this product and the ones linked to the template (but not linked to another variant).
Rebranding has been done in:
- data/demo files
- html templates
- help notices
- comments
- logger messages
- and other various messages
(Commit taken from odoo-dev:8.0-improve-openerp-odoo-rlu at rev 7deaa08)
Closes#1260
product.product reuses most of the product.template views however some parts need to be excluded or replaced.
Instead of adding template only parts in base view and removing it for product, split the views in 'common' (product_template_form_view), 'template only' (product_template_only_form_view) and 'product only' (product_normal_form_view) where the first is inherited by the other two. The attribute mode='primary' on both second views allows to make sure that future inheritance of product_template_form_view and product_template_only_form_view will work with the full rendered product_template_form_view view.
This allows us to have valid buttons in crm for bill of material (filters based on active_id).
Also cleaning the mess with circular dependencies.
Denis Ledoux
Akash Balar
Olivier Dony
Aaron Bohy
Josse Colpaert
Christophe Simonis
Holger Brunn
Benoit Guillot
Martin Trigaux
Raphael Collet
Christophe Matthieu
Julien Legros
kevin wang
Simon Lejeune
Alexandre Fayolle
Fabien Pinckaers
Florian Hatat
Martin Trigaux
Richard Mathot
rlu-odoo