Returns were partially ignored when typing keystrokes, thanks to a return; when event which equaled 13, but the default behaviour (press on the focused input/button) was not prevented. This is now the case thanks to preventDefault. For instance, just after a discount set, the focused input was pressed and the associated value was added when scanning a new product with the scanner. Therefore, if we entered a discount of 30%, scanning a new product added '0', the last pushed button, to the discount, and then added the product.
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131209145652-3g9rgnfz1w8k0whw
The set method of the field, set_followers, is now using message_subscribe and message_unsubscribe to have only one access point to adding or removing followers. Previously to this fix it was directly creating entries in the mail_followers table, neglecting the calculation of subtypes and default subtypes.
bzr revid: tde@openerp.com-20131209100822-f19udgfuubshhrg3
Web client returns (4, ) operations for unchanged line in one2many widgets.
This allows to skip orm write on object where potentially has no access (eg: timesheet line with another user). (opw 599494)
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20131206144301-k6ugjota873nz75d
don't create new analytic lines at move creation, will do it once the move is balanced
don't remove analytic lines (to avoid duplicates) at the begining of the validation of a move, will do it once we create the new correct analytic lines (opw 597719)
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20131206131125-fvzy62qqx3gnwmw5
Deliveries to invoice in sales menu should display delivery order only (no incoming shipment). This was already the case thanks to the domain [('type','=','out')], but since the refactor of the module stock, and the division of stock.picking to stock.picking.in and stock.picking.out, the model of this view should be stock.picking.out instead of stock.picking (for instance, to get the actions binding (ir.values) of stock.picking.out model).
+ typo fix in action binding
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131206111336-dg01y92jvjnxy5oi
remove analytic lines (to avoid duplicates) only when create new one instead of each validation of the account move
don't create new analytic lines at move creation, will do it once the move is balanced (unbalanced move should not create analytic lines yet)
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20131206104659-vct8a5l9o4nmhwqs
More consistent behaviour. Was not able to access unauthorized data (retrieving data on x2m field would trigger security rules) but make sure it raises an exception instead of silently retrieve no data.
Move construct domain inside if clause as no needed before
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20131205113254-j3j4bb0p6ed23oht
case: web_kanban_gauge has been added in the dependance of sale_crm. This module used to auto install when module sale and crm were installed. With this new dependance, the module sale_crm auto install when sale, crm and web_kanban_gauge are installed. We auto install kanban gauge so sale_crm auto install on installation of crm and sales, as web_kanban_gauge will be already installed
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131205093615-1c9z0g5439xokdbt
Force readonly="0" on field image in preferences view, otherwise the readonly can be set by access rights.
Preferences are written with the UID 1, if the fields are in the WRITEABLE FIELDS list of the object res_users.
This is why any users can edit their preferences even if they do not have the rights to write on res.users.
Forcing readonly="0" to make fields editable in the form.
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131204145923-f7jwoah722q188d7
Because defaults get function of partner_id of wizard read the partner_id of the opp and return the first item of the tuple, but if there isnt a partner on the opp, the read return a false for this field, not a tuple.
No return the first item of the tuple if the partner_id is set, else False
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131204133633-t7wfbnipv3jtss82
In im_session model, field channel_id was a many2one to im_user, or, obviously, this should be a many2one to im_livechat.channel
Well, obviously, this is a copy/paste error (or distraction, your choice!). This fix should normally not be pushed on a stable branch (like the current one, saas-2), but considering the severity of the problem, and the few changes in database (alter foreign key only), this is acceptable. Why such a big mistake has not been seen earlier ? Do you even test or read back what you write ?
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20131204122727-q0ch5j2v8rrli41e
Martin Trigaux
Launchpad Translations on behalf of openerp
Xavier Morel
Antony Lesuisse
Christophe Simonis
Denis Ledoux
Thibault Delavallée