9f0120d73b solved this issue already, but
it was only applied to POS orderlines. There is other data on the
report (eg. payments, taxes, ...) that should also correctly respect the
user time zone as well.
opw-678748
When clicking on save several time when editing a view form it can be
saved several times which can be an issue for one to many.
The normal happenstance when saving should be as follow:
-> save (click)
-> wait write result
-> received write result
-> reload the form with updated data and updates buttons
But when clicking several time, it could become:
-> save (click)
-> wait write result
-> received write result
-> save (click)
-> wait write result
-> received write result
-> reload the form with updated data and updates buttons
This commit only reinstate the saving feature once the form is reloaded.
related to opw-671793
backport of 8.0's dd714ac
note: no need to forward-port
The _auto_init method was overriden without keeping the return value of
the super on some models.
This break the new stored computed fields computation at field creation.
Closes#11985
opw-677232
The user performing reconciliations may not always
have the right to update the corresponding partners,
for example if a partner is also a system user.
Doing it as super-user after verifying that the
user is indeed allowed to reconcile journal items
works around the problem.
Fixes#11931
This case corresponds to searches like `[(field, 'ilike', name)]` where `field`
is a many2many field. The domain processing performs a `name_search` on the
field's comodel, then makes the relation match the returned record ids.
Problem: the call to `name_search` uses the default limit (100), and this makes
the search return less results than expected. Make the search complete by
forcing `limit=None`.
When setting rules on models having o2m/m2m relationship
between each other
e.g.
- `res.partner`:
o2m `sale_order_ids` to `sale.order`
- `sale.order`
o2m `message_follower_ids` to `res.partner`
an infinite loop could occur if records
of these models referenced records of the
other models in their o2m relationships
e.g.
- `res.partner` ID 68:
`sale.order` ID 9 in its `sale_order_ids`
- `sale.order` ID 9:
`res.partner` ID 68 in its `message_partner_ids`
This revision solves this use case, by passing the already
treated records in the context and checking that the records
haven't yet be treated before making the recursive call.
This revision makes sure to not break the API of methods
`get_data_context` and `prepare_audittrail_log_line`
(a new parameter had to be introduced for the above purpose)
opw-670904
Chrome 50 treats percent-height divs inside of auto-height cells as
auto [1]. So from now on it's important that an explicit 'height: 100%' CSS
property is set on parent tds, otherwise you'll end up with elements
with a height of 0.
DO NOT FORWARD-PORT!
[1] 8876584335
Catching and hiding database transactional errors can
sometimes cause a POS order to be entirely lost.
When it occurs, the transaction won't be committed
into the database, and if there is only one order
in the batch, the server won't return any error to
the frontend POS which will consider the order saved.
Users may sometimes need to edit their own partner records directly,
although indirect access by writing on `res.users` directly works
fine in most cases.
If the costing method of the product is "average", the price unit
of the stock move is set in the currency of the field "price_currency_id"
with the function "do_partial" (addons/stock/stock.py).
opw:672552
When the user chooses as product image a file which is not an image, the
message "Could not display the selected image" is displayed. However, at
saving, a traceback is thrown since the file chosen is uploaded anyway.
If the image cannot be displayed, the image field is cleared.
opw-672206
When delivering a delivery order (`stock.picking.out`),
which generates accounting entries
e.g. thanks to the real-time stock valuation,
the date of the move set was the UTC today date, while it must
be the user's today date, using the timezone passed in the
context.
This prevented the delivery of the `stock.picking.out`
when the `Check date in period` boolean was checked
in the stock journal, and the user date is in the previous
month compared to the UTC date, as the date set on the move
entries were not in the selected period for these move entries.
e.g. When the user timezone is UTC -8, and his current time is
2016-02-29 18:00:00, the UTC date is 2016-03-01 02:00:00, the
period chosen is February (correct), but the date on the move
entries were set to 2016-03-01.
opw-670820
The Sales Details report wizard gives the possibility
to print the details of the POS orders between two dates.
The fields in the wizard are of type `date`,
while the orders dates are of type `datetime`.
`00:00:00` and `23:59:59` were naively added
to the `date_start` and `date_end` (respectively) to
handle the case.
But, this doesn't take care of the user time zone:
When a user choose between February 24th and February 25th,
it's within his time zone, and therefore, for the search,
where the datetime are in UTC, adding `00:00:00` isn't enough,
the dates have to be converted from the user time zone
to UTC.
opw-6698831
Use the same factor than the one used when
computing the products to consume at confirm.
Before, the quantity of products to consume was wrong
when using a different unit of measure in the BOM
than in the production order.
e.g.
- BoM defined as:
- 1 dozen of milk
- BoM lines: 1 cow
- Production order:
- 1 unit of milk
- BoM: The above one
At confirm, the quantity to consume is 0,083 cow (1 cow / 12, this is correct)
But, when updating the quantity to 2.0,
it updated the quantity of cow to 24.0, instead of 0,16.
opw-669447
The result of searching on a o2m field for a missing ID was
the whole set of records which do not have any lines in the
o2m fields. This is definitely not the desired behavior,
and could lead to disatrous performance, because the
returned set could be extremely large.
One example of such behavior is for recomputing fields
in the env cache in 8.0+. When a o2m line gets deleted,
it triggers the recompute of any dependent fields.
In order to locate the records to recompute, the ORM
searches for the 'parent' records in the comodel table.
When this operation is done by 2 users concurrently
the o2m line may not exist anymore, and the bug
is triggered: dependent fields are recomputed on a possibly
very large set of records that did not need any recompute!
The kanban CSS applies both a 90 degree rotation and a top-bottom rtl
writing mode to folded kanban group titles. This was initially fine
because browsers didn't support the (SVG) "tb-rl" value for writing-mode
and the property was thus ignored. Firefox 43 (December 2015) and Chrome
48 (January 2016) added support for this value, and thus now end up with
a 180 degree rotation on the title.
Issue #7955 fixed it in 8.0 due to MSIE impact, this is essentially a
backport to 7.0.
close#10687
The LDAP method filter_format(filter_template,assertion_values) requires
that the length of assertion_values matches the count of %s in
filter_template. If not, a TypeError exception is thrown.
This fix catches the exception and displays an understandable error
message instead.
opw-608126
opw-657370
When a new column has been added after that some data already exists,
the old lines will keep an empty/null value. So when we search is the new field
is equals to False or if it is different of True, we need to match the null
values.
Backport of de3b64018a
This revision back-ports revisions
983d5eb9fa
&
ccbb8e09a6
regarding this signature regex.
Besides, it adds the fact the dashes have to
be at the beginning of the line
to make them detected as a signature.
opw-655834
The decimal precisions for the quantities, cost/supplier price
per unit of measure were not respected. It was always
set to 2 digits, whatever the configuration in the database
decimal precisions.
opw-653143
The current code when applying negative operator on an expression used
recursion which in extreme case is not best friend with python.
e.g: on instance with a lot of wharehouse, some simple action could lead
to a domain with lot of elements which could easiliy go over the python
maximum recursion limit.
This commit fixes this by replacing recursion with iteration.
We have a stack of negation flags and loop on each token of the domain
as follow :
- when we iterate on a leaf, it consumes the top negation flag,
- after a '!' operator, the top token negation is inversed,
- after an '&' or '|' operator, the top negation flag is duplicated on
the top of the stack.
closes#9433
opw-653802
For these function fields, bypassing the ORM, using a SQL query,
improves the execution time by 100 for a set of 80 timesheets
in a database with
- 250K `hr.analytic.timesheet`
&
- 250K `hr.attendance`.
These function fields depends on a one2many field which use
the SQL view `hr_timesheet_sheet_sheet_day`.
When performing `sheet.period_ids`, two SQL requests are performed,
- the first just to know the ids in the sql view matching this sheet
- the second to read the fields `total_attendance` & `total_timesheet`
and the request is performed on the entire set of lines of this view
(~250K lines in the observed use case)
while, when replaced by this SQL request, only one request is performed,
on a restricted set of lines, speeding up significantly the computation
of these computed fields for smaller sets of sheets.
opw-653447
In some complex use case of a workflow instance with several workitems,
a given workitem processing could itself somewhat recursively process
one of the following workitems.
This situation was currently not taken into account, so in that given
case, the already processed workitems would be processed again.
opw-647580
Odoo Translation Bot
Joren Van Onder
Nicolas Lempereur
Sylvain GARANCHER
Olivier Dony
Raphael Collet
Denis Ledoux
Goffin Simon
Nicolas Martinelli
Cedric Snauwaert
Denis Leemann
Yuriy A. Apollov
Jeremy Kersten