This revision is related to 1b8c9aed9f
As `manual` is now the default value of the `state`,
if `state` is not given in the values when passed to
`create` or `write` of `ir.model` and `ir.model.fields`,
we must assume the value is `manual`, so the columns and tables
are instanciated in database
opw-657750
This was possible to create custom fields `x_*`
but seen as base fields.
For instance,
- Go to Settings > Technical > Database Structure > Fields
- Select a field (any)
- Click on the model link, to be redirected to the model form
- Edit & add a custom field from there.
- Save
- Notice that the field you just added is saved as a base field.
We solve this issue by assuming that all created fields and models
are customs, except the ones created by the ORM, by the database
initialization, the fields coming from the modules in python.
We therefore remove the mechanism on which a field was set
as custom according to the fact `manual` was set to True within
the context: This is now the case by default.
No change was required for the base fields: The `state` `base`
was already forced for those fields, that are created using
direct SQL requests `INSERT INTO`.
opw-657312
Add the possibility in the decorator to specify the `upgrade` and `downgrade`
functions that convert values between APIs. Both function have the same API:
upgrade(self, value, *args, **kwargs)
downgrade(self, value, *args, **kwargs)
The arguments ``self``, ``*args`` and ``**kwargs`` are the ones passed to the
method, following its new-API signature.
Fixes#4944, #7830.
The attribute `data-oe-*` (`data-oe-id`, `data-oe-model`, ...)
must not be added when rendering the assets, to avoid
having different assets content,
e.g. a different content for the assets_common,
according if the user is signed in or not,
if the user can edit the website or not.
A different content for an assets according to the
users rights or the user being signed in or not means
that the assets are permanently re-written in the filestore,
which is against the point of the assets.
The content of the assets (assets_common) must not be
different from time to time, it must always be the same
(except when installing a new module, obviously).
Adding the `data-oe` attributes was pointless for the assets
anyway, and prevented having an identical content all
the time, therefore rewritting the assets all the time
in the filestore.
opw-657046
When making on model A a read_group with groupby equal to a many2one field F1 to a model B
which is ordered by a inherited not stored field F2, the group containing all the
records from A with F1 not set was not returned.
Example:
model A= "hr.applicant"
model B= "res.users" (_order = "name,login")
inherited model= "res.partner"
field F1= "user_id"(to "res.users)
field F2= "name"(inherited from "res.partner")
In this example, the query generated by the function "read_group" was:
SELECT min(hr_applicant.id) AS id, count(hr_applicant.id) AS user_id_count , "hr_applicant"."user_id" as "user_id"
FROM "hr_applicant" LEFT JOIN "res_users" as "hr_applicant__user_id" ON ("hr_applicant"."user_id" = "hr_applicant__user_id"."id"),"res_partner" as "hr_applicant__user_id__partner_id"
WHERE ("hr_applicant"."active" = true) AND ("hr_applicant__user_id"."partner_id" = "hr_applicant__user_id__partner_id"."id")
GROUP BY "hr_applicant"."user_id","hr_applicant__user_id__partner_id"."name","hr_applicant__user_id"."login"
ORDER BY "hr_applicant__user_id__partner_id"."name" ,"hr_applicant__user_id"."login"
which always returned "hr.applicant" groups of records with a "user_id" set due to the inner join maked on res_partners.
This inner join on "res_partner" is coming from function "add_join" calling by "_inherits_join_add"
in _generate_order_by_inner.
Introduced by dac52e344c
opw:651949
Avoid "patching" the registry, as this introduces inconsistencies (some field
attributes are lost). Instead, proceed as follows:
- update the definition of custom fields in database;
- clear the corresponding cache on the registry (this was missing);
- setup the models in registry (this reloads the custom models and fields);
- update the database schema of the models based on the registry.
This makes the update of custom fields simpler and more robust.
The recomputation should not be necessary, as we normally don't change the
record referred by an ir_model_data record. This speeds up the creation of
ir_model_data records by 33%, which should be noticeable during module
installations.
Consider the following setting:
- on model A, field F is computed, stored, and depends on field G
- on model A, field one2many G to model B, with inverse field H
- on model B, field many2one H is inherited (_inherits) from model C
- on model C, field many2one H is stored
When adding records of model B, the field F must be recomputed. In order to
determine which records to recompute, one searches model A with a domain like
[(G, 'in', ids)]. In expression.py, this is resolved with an SQL query like
select H from B where id in {ids}
This query fails, since the field H is not stored in model B. This happens in
general if H is not stored (it may be any computed field). In that case, one
should instead browse records from B, and read field H through the ORM.
A test case has been added: it introduces a many2one field in a parent model,
and a one2many field using the inherited many2one on a child model. The test
checks whether one can search on the one2many field.
The risk was introduced by b7f1b9c.
IF _store_set_values() recall another _create() or _write(),
the recomputation mechanism enter in an infinite recursion
trying to reevaluate for each call exactly the same fields
for the same records than the previous one
This revision replaces the loop of _store_set_values()
by 2 nested loops:
- that not breaks the entire consumption
of recompute_old queue
(Tested thanks to revision a922d39),
- that allows to clear the queue
before each recomputations bundle fixing thereby the recursion
Closes#7558