Consider fields G1 and G2 being computed fields with inverse methods that
require the value of a common dependency F, which is also a computed field.
For inversing G1 and G2, their values are put in cache, then their inverse
method is called. If the inverse method of G1 requires the computation of F,
setting F's value will invalidate both G1 and G2 in cache. Hence the value of
G2 is lost when invoking its inverse method!
The fix consists in marking G1 and G2 as being computed before invoking their
inverse method, which prevents them from being invalidated by field F.
Our usage of domain on fields One2many seems to trigger an obscure behaviour on
onchange.
With the following (simplified) config:
Message(models.Model):
_name = 'test_new_api.message'
important = fields.Boolean('Important')
Discussion(models.Model):
_name = 'test_new_api.discussion'
name = fields.Char('Name')
important_emails = fields.One2Many('test_new_api.emailmessage', 'discussion',
domain=[('important', '=', True)])
Email(models.Model):
_name = 'test_new_api.emailmessage'
_inherits = {'test_new_api.message': 'message'}
discussion = fields.Many2one('test_new_api.discussion', 'Discussion')
message = fields.Many2one('test_new_api.message', 'Message')
Steps:
- We change 'name' on discussion, triggers an `onchange()` call
- we ends up filling cache on virtual record (on secondary fields, we calling
record.mapped('important_emails.important'))
- we get a cache miss ('important' field not provided, only 'important_emails' ids,
i.e with no change on existing records)
- we fill the cache, this mark 'important' field as modified
- because of commit 5676d81 and because 'important' is that case is a related (i.e
computed) field we triggers cache recomputation
- as there is no way to recompute 'important_emails' for virtual record (no real
ID) we ends up with empty 'important_emails' generating removal of existing records.
=> Finally changing any value for 'test_new_api.discussion' that trigger an onchange
will always reset 'important_emails' to empty
Fixed by Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>, and test by Xavier Alt <xal@odoo.com>.
This reverts commit d780f9476d.
Did not work due to the size=3 on name field that strips the code to the first
three letters only (removing the " (copy)" part).
Copying a currency has a few business cases as the rates are not copied.
As can not increase the size of a field in stable, remove the method that had no
effect.
Fixes#11036
The _auto_init method was overriden without keeping the return value of
the super on some models.
This break the new stored computed fields computation at field creation.
Closes#11985
opw-677232
Invalidate the cache of a x2many field when any of the fields appearing in its
domain is modified. Use the invalidation triggers mechanism for that purpose.
On the `res.company` model, the fields
`name`, `phone`, `email`, `website`, `vat` are
related field on the `partner_id` of the company.
When creating a new company, the partner
associated to the company is created automatically,
it's handled in the overrided `create` method
of the model, but it forgots the values
`phone`, `email`, `website`, `vat` at the moment
the partner is being created.
opw-675526
This fixes the case where the lines of a one2many field are modified several
times by onchange methods: instead of retrieving the most recent updates, we
merge them with former updates.
This solution was written as an improvement of a proposal made by Alexis
Delattre and Sébastien Beau as #11620.
This revision corrects a regression introduced by
8395f0d217e16df18fcc6f4309fe74b0dd8d50a2:
the possibility to call
`ir.qweb.field.datetime`.`value_to_html` with
a datetime string directly, instead of calling
`ir.qweb.field.datetime`.`record_to_html`
(which call `value_to_html` as well).
opw-675427
The dates of an event on the website was always
within the user timezone. If not signed in,
it was within the public user timezone
(which is quite not user-friendly to change)
For this purpose, we weed get the context
from the record (the context used when using
`record.with_context`), and therefore
the QWeb field
`ir.qweb.field.datetime` is slightly altered,
to use the context from the record.
opw-675427
Users may sometimes need to edit their own partner records directly,
although indirect access by writing on `res.users` directly works
fine in most cases.
Could not edit t-field content if modified by inherit xpath,
and could not inherit qweb views with non "xpath" nodes with
`position="attributes"`.
Examples:
Can't edit: `<data><xpath expr="div[@t-field='object.test']"
position="replace"><div t-field="object.test"/></xpath></data>`
Inherit doesn't work: `<data><h1 position="replace"/><h1
class="test">tata</h1></data>`
Closes#11561Closes#11547
To reproduce the bug:
- Create a partner.
- Set it state "Alaska".
- Country becomes "United States".
- Set a country for YourCompany, such as Spain.
- Create a partner.
- Set it state "Alaska".
- Country remains blank.
Also, `node.xpath("//field")` was running over every `<field>` in the
view, not just those inside the `<div class="address_format">`. Now it
only traverses the right nodes, which renders every affected view
faster.
The ir.actions.todo record base.open_menu is used to redirect the user
to a menu after installing a module.
To do so, a new module override the record changing its action (toward a
menu) and setting its state to "open".
But with f7fe753 when one such changed action is removed after
uninstalling a module (or removing the action by any other way) the
base.open_menu would also be removed. Thus thereafter the open_menu will
not work anymore (since type "automatic" is lost).
With this commit, when whenever base.open_menu is removed, instead its
action will be replaced by base.action_client_base_menu which is the
original action.
closes#11224
related to: #11216, opw-660269
This is related to revision 80b373f.
The above revision leads to the inability
to import new records without any `xml_id` set
Technically speaking, this is because
you cannot concatenate `False` with `'_'`, in
`xml_id + '_'`
opw-668962
The result of searching on a o2m field for a missing ID was
the whole set of records which do not have any lines in the
o2m fields. This is definitely not the desired behavior,
and could lead to disatrous performance, because the
returned set could be extremely large.
One example of such behavior is for recomputing fields
in the env cache in 8.0+. When a o2m line gets deleted,
it triggers the recompute of any dependent fields.
In order to locate the records to recompute, the ORM
searches for the 'parent' records in the comodel table.
When this operation is done by 2 users concurrently
the o2m line may not exist anymore, and the bug
is triggered: dependent fields are recomputed on a possibly
very large set of records that did not need any recompute!
Martin Trigaux
Odoo Translation Bot
Raphael Collet
Xavier ALT
Christophe Simonis
Sylvain GARANCHER
Olivier Dony
Denis Ledoux
Christophe Matthieu
Jairo Llopis
Nicolas Lempereur
Cedric Snauwaert