For these function fields, bypassing the ORM, using a SQL query,
improves the execution time by 100 for a set of 80 timesheets
in a database with
- 250K `hr.analytic.timesheet`
&
- 250K `hr.attendance`.
These function fields depends on a one2many field which use
the SQL view `hr_timesheet_sheet_sheet_day`.
When performing `sheet.period_ids`, two SQL requests are performed,
- the first just to know the ids in the sql view matching this sheet
- the second to read the fields `total_attendance` & `total_timesheet`
and the request is performed on the entire set of lines of this view
(~250K lines in the observed use case)
while, when replaced by this SQL request, only one request is performed,
on a restricted set of lines, speeding up significantly the computation
of these computed fields for smaller sets of sheets.
opw-653447
The timezone of hr_analytic_sheet should be the timezone
of the employee as well, so sheet analytic lines and attendances
lines are grouped within the same timezone, the timezone
of the employees, so the time difference between the analytic
lines and the attendances lines can be properly computed.
Fixes#5809Fixes#5379
Related to rev. 3bf1615ad4
In a timesheet, when a sign in is added, and a sign out
is not following, the current time is took as sign out value.
Rev. dbb2a669f4 corrected an issue
regarding the worked hours summary not taking into account
the employee timezone.
This timezone has to be applied on the current_time also.
e.g: For an employee being in timezone UTC + 1
If the current_time is presently 12:00 (UTC+1)
If the employee set his sign in to 10:00
and do not entered a sign out
The hours summary table displayed 1:00 of worked hours,
based on computation (11:00 - 10:00)
11:00 being 12:00 but in timezone UTC
Besides, another issue was present when entering
a sign in at midnight exactly without a sign out:
If the employee set his sign in to 00:00:00
and do not set a sign out, worked hours displayed 0 worked hours
whatever the current time.
Fixes#5379Closes#5378Closes#5503
The module analytic_user_function allows to define a specific product
to use, when creating timesheet activities for a specific employee
with a specific contract
Nevertheless, the product was not set accordingly to this feature
for the first timesheet activity, because,
when initilialing the timesheet line,
the on_change_account_id, which returns
the product to use according to the user and contract, was called
without passing the user.
Besides, by default, on_change_account_id does not have a user_id parameter,
this parameter is added by the module analytic_user_function, overriding
this onchange, and adding a new user_id parameter (which is not a good pratice).
We therefore use multi_on_change_account_id, which allow to pass the user_id,
within the context
Once a timesheet confirmed, the activity hours should not be modified,
for any reasons.
The constraint _check_sheet_state prevents to modify activities
for confirmed timesheets, but does not prevent the addition
of new activities within the current, but confirmed, timesheet.
opw-627415
fixes#5128
If an employee in UTC + 1 (Europe/Brussels) entered an attendance from January 2 00:00 to Januay 2 23:59, the summary by day table displayed two different lines, for two different days:
- 1 hour on January 1 from 23:00 to 23:59
- 22:59 hours on January 2 from 00:00 to 22:59
Which is obviously wrong, the employee, in its own time zone, worked on January 2 only.
The attendance date recieved by the server is in UTC while the user sees it in his timezone. This means that an attendance could be in a timesheet (bounded by dates) for a user but not for the server which would not accept a valid attendance.
The fix will make the check in the user's timezone.
Only the date part of the attendance is kept for comparison as the boundaries are dates objects.
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20140428153216-4s6r5hu1ov0p0ofm
on_change_unit_amount was called manually in the timesheet widget. Normally, save waits for all on_change to be applied, but in this case, as the on_change its called manually in the js, it was not the case.
The fix is to put all deferreds for which we must wait for in an array, and to wait all deferreds to be done before saving.
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20140115165114-nqa2ynszgocrnt52
Odoo Translation Bot
Denis Ledoux
Martin Trigaux
Olivier Dony
Anthony Muschang
Christophe Simonis
rmu-odoo
Martin Trigaux
Laetitia Gangloff
Yannick Vaucher
Launchpad Translations on behalf of openerp
Denis Ledoux