The `related_usage` field of `purchase.order`
is a related field to the location `usage` field,
which is defined in order to display/hide
some other field in the PO according to the location usage
This is purely a technical field, which is set only
to change the form view according to the location
usage.
This is not expected to change the location usage
through this field, this field must therefore
be set to readonly.
A change on the location usage could happen because
of the `onchange_picking_type_id`:
If the user changed the picking type, and then the location,
the usage returned by the `onchange_picking_type_id` was
applied on the location, and this must not have happened.
In addition, since `related_usage` is a related to the location
usage, it should be changed as well when the location is changed.
(in the new api, this is no longer required, the related field
is updated automatically).
This revision therefore adds an onchange on the location as well,
to handle this.
opw-676428
To match the behaviour on sale.order.line.
Purchase line form is expected to be open in popup (where parent is defined),
not individually when creating a line alone is not useful.
Fixes#6644Closes#12325
By default, when reading a m2m field, entries that are
deactivated in the destination table are not included.
This behavior is desirable in some cases (e.g. for
"tags" or "categories", but not for entries that
significantly impact other field values in the parent
record, such as taxes.
The problem is rather obvious: when displaying a
paid invoice that used taxes that are now deactivated,
the taxes are hidden while they still affect the
computed amount. And after cancelling + resetting
to draft, the tax is not taken into account anymore,
while still being linked.
Forcing the field-level (python) domain to include
both active and inactive entries solves the problem:
- when reading, displaying and recomputing values,
deactivated taxes will be included.
- when trying to pick a tax, deactivated entries
will still be ignored, as expected.
This commit applies the technique to all m2m
fields that refer to taxes.
Fixes#12066
opw-677751
Used case:
-Configure admin as multi-company user
-Create 2 fiscal positions (one for company "Odoo BE" and one for company "Odoo US")
-Set admin on company "Odoo BE"
-On supplier (Asustek) configure fiscal position Odoo BE
-Set admin on company "Odoo US"
-On supplier (Asustek) configure fiscal position Odoo US
-Configure a product (Laptop E5023) with:
*route "Buy"
*supplier (Asustek) without company
*reordering rules (min qty: 20, max qty: 40)
-Set admin on company "Odoo BE"
-Run scheduler via the cron
Behavior before the fix:
-Fiscal position on the created PO is the fiscal position for "Odoo BE" (and PO is for the company "Odoo US")
Behavior after the fix:
-Fiscal position on the create PO is the fiscal position for "Odoo US".
Closes#11537
opw:673288
When canceling and clicking on "reset to draft" button a PO with
invoicing method = Based on generated draft invoice, the purchase
workflow led to a shipping exception.
To be in state done the PO must have:
All its PO lines invoiced with _set_po_lines_invoiced
All its incoming shipments done with test_moves_done
opw:673561
When a "Drop Shipping" route is used on a product, the origin document
is duplicated on the PO created. This is because in this case,
po_rec.origin and procurement.origin are the same.
opw-671039
Introduced by eefc76f
Only the supplier taxes of the company set in the procurement
must be set in the PO.
Backport from f5989bc3d8f10a0354a7d085576276d4e1778fbd
opw:671449
From issue 660592. (already fixed in v9) When products are received from a purchase line
with taxes included, the cost for the stock valuation (on the stock move) on reception
should be without these taxes included.
Because otherwise a user who has access to a view displaying
supplier_invoice_count will get an access error if he doesn't also have
access to purchase.order, even if that wouldn't have been displayed.
opw-666935
When a purchase order is created through a procurement order,
the purchase order pricelist is taken from
the partner `property_product_pricelist_purchase`,
which is a property, which therefore can be different
according to the company. This is therefore
important to force the company to the procurement company
when browsing the partner, to get the correct pricelist,
from the right company. Otherwise, it take the pricelist
from the `SUPERUSER` company (when running the schedulers/cron),
which can be different than the procurement company.
The same as to be applied when browsing the product,
as the `standard_price` field (Cost Price) is a property
as well, and can be different according to the company,
in order to get the correct price unit on the purchase
order line, from the correct company.
Fixes#5329Closes#5330
When adding a line in a PO with the SUPERUSER_ID all the record rules
didn't apply on him. Then all the supplier taxes set on the product
were written in the PO line even if some of its were not in the company
of the user. Then with the SUPERUSER_ID, just the company taxes of this
user must be applied. Inspired from product_id_change in model
'sale.order.line'.
opw:659236
When a make to order product is sold, a purchase order is created or added to an
existing one. In the second case, the origin of the sale order was lost.
It is now added to the existing source.
opw 656688
If the invoicing policy of a PO is set to "Based on incoming shipments"
and the PO contains a product of type "service", it is never considered
as invoiced, and therefore reach the state "Done".
The reason is that no stock move is linked to this PO line, and
therefore it is never considered as invoiced since we check the invoice
state of the associated sotck moves.
This fix assumes that in this specific case, a PO line for a service is
always invoiced, since there is anyway no incoming shipment linked to
it.
opw-654317