In a survey question of type `matrix`,
nothing prevents to remove a row from the matrix,
even if there are already answers for this line.
If the case happens, the row is deleted, but
not the answers. The answers are therefore orphan.
The answers should probably be deleted when the
row is removed from the survey, but this is a risky
change, and, even, users might want to keep track
of the answers given even if the line doesn't exist
anymore in the survey.
Therefore, we just handle the case when displaying
the survey results,
we ignore matrix answers for which the row no longer
exists.
opw-666393
When sharing a survey, a mail.mail is created but the attachment were lost.
This is due to a missing command (6, _, ids) when creating records in
attachment_ids field (many2many).
Fixes#9364, opw 656742
Permission error on survey update
The user who answer the survey may not have delete permission for the user_input_line
In a survey, for a survey user (!= manager),
When browsing previous pages of anwsers,
the user wasn't allowed to change his answers
regarding simple choice, multiple choices and matrix
questions, as this kind of answers changes leaded to an
unlink operation, not allowed for survey users.
Closes#2901
Allow the partner associated to a survey user input to read the data on
this output.
A survey can be created by a different user than the one
filling it, for example an appraisal interview request can be created by
another user than its interviewer. In this case if the interviewer is
not Survey / Manager an error would happen.
closes#7978
opw-644791
When building a new suvery, and sending invitation
trough private emails, it wasn't possible
to fill the survey from the link sent
if you were not logged as the user who sent
the invitation, or as a survey manager
opw-644210
Fixes#7486
Some tests (e.g. mail) have expensive and significant DB setup for a
number of small and cheap tests. Using a TransactionCase, the DB setup
far dominates the tests themselves, by up to 10x (mail unit tests take
~130s on my machine, the tests themselves take ~15s).
The SavepointCase introduced here is an hybrid of SingleTransactionCase
and TransactionCase: it uses a single transaction for all tests in a
class, but each test case is isolated by a rollbacked savepoint. This
allows a common DB setup (via setUpClass) while keeping independent
tests.
TransactionCase should remain the primary test case superclass, but
SavepointCase can be a fair optimisation when setup costs far dominate.
If a survey has "allow users to go back" option enabled, users can go back to previous pages and change their answers before submitting the whole survey.
This commit fixes the very special case, when the user reaches the last page of the survey, then click on "Previous" button, then reopen the survey from the invitation URL (/survey/fill/<survey_id>/<token> without the /prev flag in the URL). This won't crash anymore.
This commit fixes#2658 and #2680.
When user answers to multiple suggestion questions with a comment box,
the comment box was prefilled with the ID's of the suggestion instead of
user-entered data.
This commit fixes#3149 and closes#3171.
Avoid creation of doublon survey_user_input entries when a user loads the landing page of a survey (/survey/start/... route).
Due to some strange spec, jQuery.ajax() function called with "undefined" URL will do an extra call to the URL of the webpage where the script lies (http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/). Now, we check that URL is not "undefined" to avoid those calls.
By the way, this problem probably happened in every page that had survey.js in its assets... (correct loading of survey.js is fixed in saas-6 at 4dd5dbb28974b3f0d9cbcc9b502aab2d83b5e6f3, this fix is complementary.)
This commit fixes#3032 and closes#3337#3338#3092.
Since yesterday, JS bundles are now loaded at the end of the webpage.
Old-style modules that hardlink js code in the <head> section are now
broken since they use jQuery's $.
Rebranding has been done in:
- data/demo files
- html templates
- help notices
- comments
- logger messages
- and other various messages
(Commit taken from odoo-dev:8.0-improve-openerp-odoo-rlu at rev 7deaa08)
Closes#1260
A squashed merge is required as the conversion of the apiculture branch from
bzr to git was not correctly done. The git history contains irrelevant blobs
and commits. This branch brings a lot of changes and fixes, too many to list
exhaustively.
- New orm api, objects are now used instead of ids
- Environements to encapsulates cr uid context while maintaining backward compatibility
- Field compute attribute is a new object oriented way to define function fields
- Shared browse record cache
- New onchange protocol
- Optional copy flag on fields
- Documentation update
- Dead code cleanup
- Lots of fixes
Odoo Translation Bot
Denis Ledoux
Martin Trigaux
Tony
Nicolas Lempereur
Xavier Morel
Olivier Dony
Richard Mathot
Nick Booker
Aaron Bohy
Jeremy Kersten
Martin Trigaux
MadeleineHero
Richard Mathot
jas
Xavier Morel
Thibault Delavallée
Fabien Pinckaers
Christophe Simonis
rlu-odoo
Raphael Collet
Jaydeep Barot